Join PANO and the National Council of Nonprofits in calling our Senator’s to advocate for a health care bill that will expand rather than contract affordable coverage and that will promote affordability for all Americans. PANO gathered feedback from Pennsylvania's nonprofit sector to learn both your position and also how you see H.R. 1628 Better Care Reconciliation Act impacting those you serve. Of the 106 participants responding to the survey:
• 87% oppose the legislation
• 7% support the legislation
• 7% are undecided
Those opposed to the bill named various groups of vulnerable Pennsylvania citizens who would be negatively impacted by this bill including: those in need of drug and alcohol treatment (e.g. those addicted to heroin and opioids), persons with disabilities (e.g. autism, intellectual disabilities), those seeking housing, education, job placement, veterans senior citizens and inmates. Check out the full survey results.
PANO joins with our members providing critical services in Pennsylvania and the National Council of Nonprofits in opposing H.R. 1628.
We urge our senators to expand healthcare access and reject proposals that would cause millions of Americans to lose their coverage or make harmful changes to Medicaid.
1. Healthcare coverage should be affordable, attainable and adequate to meet the health needs of children, families and individuals.
2. Medicaid is critical to families and communities. Currently, Medicaid provides comprehensive and affordable healthcare coverage to over 97 million Americans who would otherwise go uninsured. These include our most vulnerable populations: children, seniors and people with disabilities.
3. Children with Medicaid protects working families from financial hardships and ensures their children have healthcare to remain healthy and have the opportunity to succeed in school.
Support our communities by opposing this bill and working with Congress to find a solution that provides affordable, attainable and adequate healthcare for all children, families and individuals living in Pennsylvania.
- Health Care Letter to Senators524.72 K | 7/6/2017
- Health Care Survey Results713.2 K | 7/6/2017
The U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services has approved a FY2018 appropriations bill that includes an extraneous provision (rider) that would significantly weaken enforcement of the law on nonprofit nonpartisanship, the language in Section 501(c)(3) sometimes called the Johnson Amendment. The full house committee will vote on the House Financial Services and General Government FY2018 Appropriations bill Thursday, July 13.
Pennsylvania Representatives, Matt Cartwright and Charles Dent serve on the House Appropriations Committee. If you live in Pennsylvania's 17th Congressional District, we encourage you to contact Representative Cartwright's Office. If you live in Pennsylvania's 15th Congressional District, we urge you to contact Representative's Dent's office. Include this simple message: "I'm your constituent, and I ask that you act to strip the Johnson Amendment language in Section 116 from the Financial Services appropriations bill. We need to keep politics out of nonprofit work."
The rider, Section 116 of the Appropriations bill, would prevent the IRS from spending any funds to make a final determination that a house of worship or its affiliate has violated the Johnson Amendment unless the IRS meets three conditions: (1) the Commissioner of the IRS consents to a determination of unlawful conduct; (2) politicians on the House and Senate tax committees are given 30-days' notice of the law-enforcement determination; and (3) an additional 90-days' notice is provided before enforcement can commence. According to Newsweek, Section 116 "would make it exponentially more difficult to enforce" even the most blatant violations of the Johnson Amendment. The rider is flawed in that it would erect unconstitutional, unreasonable hurdles on enforcing the law that ensures nonpartisanship. Tim Delaney, President & CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits, has an excellent article in the Nonprofit Quarterly explaining why this provision is a threat to all 501(c)(3) nonprofits.
Nonpartisanship Is a Shield and Not a Barrier
The voting public in the United States trusts charities more than they trust political parties or any one politician. See Independent Sector's United for Charity Report. But one tenet underpinning the public’s confidence is in imminent jeopardy: nonpartisanship.
After hearing from nonprofits from around the Commonwealth, PANO joined the National Council of Nonprofits in signing the community letter in Support of Nonpartisanship. Over 4,800 organizations signed the community letter of support, calling on Congress to protect the longstanding Johnson Amendment and nonprofit nonpartisanship. Check out this press release from the National Council of Nonprofits. Thank you to everyone who added your organization to the letter.
The Johnson Amendment
The Johnson Amendment prohibits 501(c)(3)s from directly or indirectly participating in any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate. Charities are prohibited from fundraising for and endorsing or opposing candidates for political office; ministers are restricted from endorsing or opposing candidates from the pulpit. If they do, they risk losing their tax-exempt status. The Johnson Amendment does allow these same nonprofits to advocate for mission-related issues.
President Trump vowed to get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment. His words were quickly followed by actions when Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee, Kevin Brady, stated his intent to repeal the law as part of comprehensive tax reform. The House Majority Whip, Steve Scalise, is lead sponsor of one of three bills (S.264, H.R. 781 and H.R. 172) that would weaken this protection.
Why Nonpartisanship Matters
Repealing the Johnson Amendment could tarnish the integrity of the nonprofit and philanthropic community, damaging public trust in the impartiality and independence of our sector and our mandate to "do good." PANO joins National Council of Nonprofits, the Independent Sector, the Council on Foundations and hundreds of charitable nonprofits in support of nonpartisanship. We strongly oppose efforts to politicize charities by eliminating the Johnson Amendment for these reasons:
1. These proposals may subject charities and foundations to demands from candidates for endorsements and campaign contributions, potentially diverting donor money away from mission-related work to benefit politicians.
2. Nonpartisanship is a shield, not a barrier.
• Participation in partisan politics can create strong opponents on issues that nonprofits care about and impede their ability to get help from those they oppose to fulfill their mission.
• Partisanship could alienate those who depend on those organizations for services or those who contribute time, talent and treasure to nonprofits.
3. The Johnson Amendment has worked for more than 60 years without significantly hampering charities.
• Nonprofit already have many legal avenues to advocate for mission-related issues with policymakers.
• Nonprofit managers and their supporters have the right to freely express their views on candidates as individuals.
4. Charities could become conduits for tax deductible contributions to be used for political activity. No other political contributions are tax deductible.
• This could open the door for more unaccountable money in our political system, because charities do not have to make public the names of their donors.
• This may be particularly true for churches because they are not required to obtain formal recognition of their exempt status and are not required to file tax returns that report their expenditures
• GuideStar Blog - Perspectives on the Johnson Amendment
- Johnson Amendment Survey Results436.95 K | 3/17/2017
Current Legislation & Issues
Charitable Giving Tax Deduction
2017 marks the 100th anniversary of the charitable tax deduction. Congress and the new administration are expected to reevaluate federal tax policies, most, notably the charitable deduction.
Your legislatures need to hear from you; let them know what the charitable deduction makes possible for your organization, your fundraising efforts and your donors. Send a letter, email and post on social media (use hashtags #100yearsofgiving and/or #ProtectGiving), see a copy of PANO’s letter below.
- Charitable Giving Tax Deduction Letter To Legislatures47.12 K | 2/16/2017
- Charitable Giving Story - For Pete's Sake499.33 K | 2/16/2017
- Charitable Giving Story - New Hope Ministries447.75 K | 2/16/2017
Recent Legislation & Issues
OMB Uniform Guidance
The federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released the interim final regulations on the Uniform Guidance (effective December 24, 2014). Included are important changes to: reimbursement for indirect costs, cost allocation, audit threshold and procurement.
Check out OMB Uniform Guidance Webinar Recording (1 hour)
A special thank-you to our presenters from the National Council of Nonprofits: David L. Thompson, Vice President of Public Policy and Beth Bowsky, Policy Specialist for Government-Nonprofit Contracting.
For more information, check out these resources:
- National Council of Nonprofits’ OMB Guidance on Indirect Costs: What It Does and Why It Matters
- National Council of Nonprofits’ OMB Toolkit: Know Your Rights . . . And How to Protect Them
- National Council of Nonprofits’ special OMB edition of Nonprofit Advocacy Matters
- Informational videos on the federal website
- CliftonLarsonAllen White Paper
- McKonly and Asbury Video on New Internal Controls
Partnering for Impact: Government-Nonprofit Contracting Task Forces Produce Results for Taxpayers
Nonprofits and governments can reduce their own costs, improve services provided to constituents, and return greater value to taxpayers by creating government-nonprofit task forces to develop and implement recommendations to reform contracting practices and procedures. That is the key finding of a new report of the National Council of Nonprofits, which conducted an extensive analysis of joint task forces in nine states charged with rooting out waste while maintaining and even enhancing accountability.
The report provides a how-to guide for nonprofits, working with their State Associations, who want to streamline the government-nonprofit contracting process. It also provides practical guides for building collaborative relationships with government officials. Download the Report
National Study of State Contracts and Grants – 2013
This compilation of state profiles from the Urban Institute's 2013 National Survey of Nonprofit-Government Contracting and Grants, provides national and state-by-state snapshots of most types of nonprofit organizations that have contracts and grants with local, state, and federal governments. The individual state profiles are designed to document the extent of nonprofit-government contracting, processes and problems.
Full Report (PA stats start on page 91)
- Charitable Giving Story - For Pete's Sake
- Health Care Survey Results